Just gonna have to break down and do it...
[Ever the peacemaker, please know the following is simply my opinion. And I have wonderful friends who are staunch republicans, however misguided they may be. Haha. That was a joke.]
Why a mid-western, Baptist preacher's daughter is voting for John Kerry:
I call them common sense reasons, but you don't have to agree:
1) Call me crazy but I feel like the leader of the free world should present himself as intelligent, thoughtful, and have all the outward skills necessary for the job. People say to me, "So you're worried about appearances." When someone is representing me and my country to the rest of the word, absolutely, yes. I feel like the president of the United States should be a package deal. I don't want to have to make an either/or choice between steadfastness and determination or an intelligent presentation, or a great orator who lacks depth and intellect. If you're going to have the highest position of power in the world, it should be expected that you have it
all. To quote a Fox news commentator, "I don't think people expect George Bush to be the best defender of his policies." Excuse me, if they're
his policies, I absolutely expect him to be their best defender.
2) You've heard the saying, "No man is an island." Well, the US is very obviously an island at this point. Common sense in life in general says isolation is dangerous. Personally, think about situations where you could be stranded or isolated, totally alone. They're never good. I feel the same goes for our country. Going it on our own without restraint or checks and balances is arrogant at best, deadly at worst. I don't usually quote Bill Maher, but I think he's right about this, when he calls the war in Iraq, "Operation Gettaload of Us." I don't think we need permission to defend our country. However, I haven't seen any evidence, nor has the 9/11 commission, that the defense of our country had anything to do with the war in Iraq.
3) I'll carefully approach the subject of right-wing, conservative faith... This applies to the presidency as well as many other view points on the war and terrorism. I cannot for the life of me understand how people who say "God" has told them to do something, whether it's run for president (which GW said), condemn minorities and homosexuals (Mr. Falwell), etc. etc. etc., do not realize they are no different than the terrorists who flew the planes into the twin towers, the pentagon, and into the ground killing thousands of Americans. "God" was the motivation for the whole thing. We tread on very dangerous and presumptuous ground when we begin to use "God" as motivation for everything. God gave us fully functioning brains for a reason. I believe He wanted us to use them. I don't see a whole lot of that going on with the current administration.
4) Gay marriage: In some states the divorce rate for heterosexual marriages is upwards of 80%. The "Defense of Marriage Act?" Defense from what? I doubt homosexuals have inspired even a miniscule rate of those divorces. The thing that angers me the most is the fact that this administration puts a moral face on the issue, and people of faith all over the country swallow it down like Mary Poppin's spoon full of sugar. This is not about morality. Like everything else in this country, it's about money. Cold, hard cash. It's about health insurance and the cost of medical care. It's about big insurance companies who back the administration losing money on premiums on joint health coverage. I would like to pose one interesting thought to you: Up until the 1960's, segregation and prejudice were promoted and legal for moral and religious reasons. I wonder how many other issues we will be able to look back on years from now and think... how did we ever think it was ok to do that?
5) The war in Iraq: No doubt Saddam was a terrible man. He killed thousands of his own people. Action should have been taken long before 2003. Call me an idealist, but I don't think expecting flawless intelligence is too much to ask. I don't know who to blame... the intelligence gatherers, or the administration for not checking it out more thoroughly or all of the above. The premise for war was faulty at best. The American people were misled. GW's "weapons of mass destruction" were the equivalent, if not much worse than Clinton's, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." At least Clinton was just lying about a blow job. GW's misleading little tidbit cost American soldiers their lives. Even if you throw the whole premise for war out the window... common sense says you can NOT change thousands and thousands of years of deeply ingrained, religious culture by overthrowing a dictator. We want to bring them freedom. We want to bring them democracy. People, they are an Islamic culture. The fundamentals of Islam are not based on freedom and democracy. It would be like some random country invading the US and telling us we were going to be a dictatorship and that we would like it. It would never work because our country was not founded on those principles. Get the idea? It's a losing battle.
And this is just the beginning. Contrary to how most heated political arguments end up, I don't have a problem with GW personally. He seems like he'd be a pretty cool guy to hang out with. I think his wife, Laura, is gorgeous and one of the most graceful women to inhabit the White House. I will never envy presidential children. They didn't ask for this life, and yet they have to deal with all the repercussions of it. My main #1 reason for not voting for GW is the fact that, I'll just say it, I'm scared to death. I plan to raise children in this country within the next 20 years. I want them to live in an intelligent society that has a prevalent and respected place in the world. I want them to be able to go overseas without being jeered. But most of all, I want them to be able to live and raise their own children without having to fear that another great hate crime inspired by American arrogance is just around the corner.